[DOWNLOAD] "State Department Highways and Public Transportation v. Stephen Cotner and Cherie R. Cotner" by Supreme Court of Texas No. D-2360 # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

📘 Read Now     📥 Download

eBook details

• Title: State Department Highways and Public Transportation v. Stephen Cotner and Cherie R. Cotner
• Author : Supreme Court of Texas No. D-2360
• Release Date : January 20, 1993
• Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
• Pages : * pages
• Size : 77 KB

Description

Per Curiam Cherie Cotner was a passenger in a car driven by her husband Stephen when it went out of control on an allegedly
iced-over bridge. The Cotners sued the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation claiming, among other things,
that the State failed to warn of a dangerous condition. A jury found Stephen and the State both negligent and equally responsible
for the accident, and assessed damages of $5,750,000.00 for Cherie, $35,000.00 for Stephen's past mental anguish and loss
of his wife's society, companionship, household services and consortium, and "0" for Stephen's future damages. The trial court
rendered judgment for Cherie, awarding her $250,000.00 as the maximum recoverable under the Texas Tort Claims Act, TEX. CIV.
PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.023(a), but severed Stephen's causes of action and granted him a new trial. The court of appeals
affirmed. ___ S.W.2d ___. The State complains that the severance and partial new trial were improper. We agree. Parties and actions may be severed "at any stage of the action, before the time of submission to the jury or to the court
if trial is without a jury, on such terms as are just." TEX. R. CIV. P. 41. Rule 41 does not "permit a trial court to sever
a case after it has been submitted to the trier of fact." Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility
Comm'n, 798 S.W.2d 560, 564 (Tex. 1990). For this reason alone the trial court's severance of Stephen's claims was improper
under Rule 41. Moreover, "[a] claim is properly severable if (1) the controversy involves more than one cause of action, (2)
the severed claim is one that would be the proper subject of a lawsuit if independently asserted, and (3) the severed claim
is not so interwoven with the remaining action that they involve the same facts and issues." Guaranty Federal Sav. Bank v.
Horseshoe Operating Co., 793 S.W.2d 652 (1990). Stephen's claims do not meet the third criterion. The facts and issues related
to liability for the accident are the same for Stephen as for Cherie, and to some extent Stephen's damage allegations are
related to the extent of damages Cherie suffered. For this additional reason the trial court erred in severing Stephen's claims.

Free PDF Download "State Department Highways and Public Transportation v. Stephen Cotner and Cherie R. Cotner" Online ePub Kindle